Another Benefit of Forensic Psychological Evaluation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66f27/66f27708b4b87cd0178b57889315383741770f19" alt=""
by Mark D. Lerner, Ph.D.
Clinical & Forensic Psychologist
Firearm regulatory agencies, typically police departments, are becoming increasingly vigilant in vetting applicants for firearm permits—particularly for concealed carry. Based on the current zeitgeist, this makes good sense. As a result, the process of issuing concealed carry permits has become more stringent. This is especially true for individuals with any history of mental health treatment, as agencies aim to mitigate potential risks.
However, a history of mental health treatment should not inherently disqualify an applicant from obtaining a firearm permit. Many people who have made the healthy, adaptive choice to pursue mental health intervention pose no current risk that would preclude them from safely owning a firearm. An impartial evaluation, including a comprehensive review of their history and functioning, can distinguish between those who may present a risk and those who are psychologically suitable for a firearm permit.
To address these concerns, I regularly conduct forensic psychological assessments, including those for law enforcement applicants, that evaluate such factors as emotional regulation, decision-making, judgment, and functional history. These evaluations are critical in balancing the need for public safety with individual rights.